IEG Data

This dashboard contains ratings data on World Bank lending projects that closed between fiscal years 2007 and 2018 and for which IEG received Implementation Completion and Results Reports (ICRs). The percentage at the top of each bar is the percent of all projects rated (by number) that are in the top half of the scale for that rating. Some ratings are on a six-point scale and some are on a four-point scale.

The default view shows ratings on Outcome. To change the view to show other ratings, use the Rating filter (drop-down). Use the other filters to narrow the data by Global Practice, Region, Country, and other options. Hover the mouse pointer over any of the data points to see details, or click here to toggle to Table View. The full data set is available for download in the Development Data Hub. To reset the dashboard to default state, click the revert-button.png button at the bottom. (Data as of August 15, 2019)

Note that the most recent fiscal year may contain few data points, with the normal elapsed time of 6 to 18 months between project closing, ICR, and IEG’s review of the ICR.

For IFC and MIGA data, see the RAP 2018 main page.

×

Ratings Data

IEG reviews all Implementation Completion and Results Reports (ICRs) received from completed World Bank lending operations, producing ICR Reviews (ICRRs). In ICRRs, IEG provides its own project ratings based on the same evaluation criteria used by the World Bank project teams. For a subset of projects, IEG performs in-depth field-based evaluations, called Project Performance Assessment Reports (PPARs). PPAR ratings supersede ICRR ratings.

This data contains the following ratings:

Outcome: the extent to which the project's major relevant objectives were achieved, or are expected to be achieved, efficiently. Both the Bank and IEG rate Outcome. Thus, the outcome rating is derived from the prior assessment of the relevance of objectives, efficacy in achieving each objective, and efficiency.

Bank Performance: the extent to which the services provided by the Bank ensured quality at entry of the project and supported effective implementation through appropriate supervision (including ensuring adequate transition arrangements for regular operation of supported activities after loan/credit closing), toward the achievement of development outcomes. Both the Bank and IEG rate Bank Performance. IEG also rates the two constituent elements – Quality at Entry and Quality of Supervision.

Monitoring and Evaluation Quality: the quality of the design and implementation of the monitoring and evaluation arrangements of the project and the extent to which the results are used to improve performance. Both the Bank and IEG rate M&E Quality.

ICR Quality: the quality of the evidence and analysis in the ICR; the extent to which the lessons are based on evidence; the results-orientation of the ICR; and its conciseness, internal consistency, and the consistency with Bank guidelines. Only IEG rates ICR Quality.

×

Six-Point Scale

  • Highly Satisfactory
  • Satisfactory
  • Moderately Satisfactory
  • Moderately Unsatisfactory
  • Unsatisfactory
  • Highly Unsatisfactory
×

Four-Point Scale

  • High
  • Substantial
  • Modest
  • Negligible